Legal Opinion

Bamford v. G. H. Hammond Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries sustained while in the defendant’s employ. The declaration contains three counts. The first and second are under the K. L. *480c. 106, § 71, els. 1 and 2, respectively, and the third is at common law. At the close of the evidence for the plaintiff, the judge directed a verdict for the defendant, and by the agreement of the parties reported the case for determination by this court. If upon the evidence the jury would have been warranted in finding a verdict for the plaintiff on any count, judgment was to be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hyde v. BoothMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Gouin v. Wampanoag MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Desautels v. CloutierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Mellen v. Thomas Wilson Sons & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crimmins v. BoothMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Saures v. Stevens Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Morris v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API