Legal Opinion

In Re Allred's Will

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1915Published

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding to caveat a will upon the ground:

1. That the paper-writing offered for probate was not executed as required by the statute in that the subscribing witnesses did not attest it in the presence of the testator.

2. For that the testator did not have sufficient mental capacity to enable him to make a will.

3. For that the execution of the will was procured by undue influence.

It was admitted upon the trial that the testator did have sufficient mental capacity, and this ground of objection to the paper-writing as a will was abandoned by the caveators.

The testator was blind and the evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dale's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  2. Eastis v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Bundy v. McKnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Lee v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  5. Bynum v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API