Legal Opinion

In re Ferro, Kuba, Bloom, Mangano, Gacovino & Lake, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

*564In a proceeding to quash a judicial subpoena duces tecum, the petitioner appeals, by permission, from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), dated March 12, 2004, which denied its application to quash the subpoena and directed the production of the subpoenaed material for in camera inspection.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the application is granted, and the subpoena is quashed.

The petitioner’s application to quash the subpoena duces tecum should have been granted. The materials requested by the subpoena are privileged communications made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Jacqueline F.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. RadtkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. County of Nassau Police Department v. JudgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Suffolk County Medical Examiner v. GuidoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API