Legal Opinion
State v. Parduhn
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 2011No. Nos. 20090744, 20090737, 20090816PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Associate Chief Justice DURRANT,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
T1 In this opinion, we address issues raised in three consolidated cases: (1) State v. Parduhn, (2) State v. Jeffs, and (8) State v. Davis. All three cases come to us on interlocutory appeal and involve nearly identical facts and issues. Mr. Parduhn, Mr. Jeffs, and Mr. Davis (collectively, the Defendants) have all been charged with crimes in Salt Lake County (the County). Although each of the Defendants was found to be indigent, and therefore qualified for representation by a public defender, each of the Defendants retained…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reece v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Turner v. Staker & Parson CompaniesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BagnesUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- R.C.S. v. A.O.L.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Richards v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Lopez v. United Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.