Legal Opinion
O'Daniel v. Kulosa
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 23, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
In this suit the plaintiff sought to recover judgment in the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty ($250.00) Dollars.
The declaration was in two counts, but only the first count need be considered because the proof submitted is applicable only to that count of the declaration. The first count of the declaration is in the following language:
The plaintiff, Arthur Kulosa, by Watson & Pasco, his attorneys, sues the defendant, Millard K. 0 ’Daniel, for that prior to the institution of this suit the defendant, representing himself to the plaintiff to be the owner of the following described property in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farrell v. Forest Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Russ v. GilbertSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Lybass v. Town of Fort MyersSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Watson v. Seat & CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1859
- North American Accident Insurance v. MorelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Florida Boca Raton Hous. Ass'n, Inc. v. Marqusee Assoc. of Fla., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Austin Burke, Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Buchanan & Crowder, Inc. v. KreamerSupreme Court of Florida · 1935