Legal Opinion

Maia v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 24, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment and order unanimously reversed upon the law, with costs and taxable disbursements, and complaint dismissed with appropriate costs in the court below.

Plaintiff has recovered a judgment based upon a tort which occurred on a British vessel in the territorial waters of Brazil. The recovery was predicated upon the negligence of a fellow-servant of the plaintiff. The “ Jones Act ” (U. S. Code, tit. 46, § 688) is inapplicable. There was neither allegation nor proof, and it may not be presumed, that a similar statute existed either in Great Britain or Brazil. The burden of estabhshing such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mexican Cent. Ry. Co. v. ChantryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
  3. Christie v. Cerro De Pasco Copper Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Christie v. Cerro De Pasco Copper CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arams v. AramsNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hogan v. Hamburg-American LineCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API