Legal Opinion
Bowdoin v. Kingloff
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 28, 1960No. 38337, 38351, 38348PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Judge.
1. “Where a motion for new trial was made on several grounds, and was granted on one of them only, the others thereby being impliedly overruled, and exception was taken to the grant of the motion, a cross-bill of exceptions would seem to be necessary in order to have the question made by the overruled grounds considered.” Wingfield v. Rhea, 77 Ga. 84, 85 (3). See also Singleton v. Southwestern R., 70 Ga. 464 (48 Am. Rep. 574); Nicholas v. Tanner, 117 Ga. 223 (1) (43 S. E. 489). It follows that where, as here, the plaintiff in the trial court filed a bill of exceptions after…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williams v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Langenback v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Singleton v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Neal Loan & Banking Co. v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Roberts v. Investors Savings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Derryberry v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Bowdoin v. KingloffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960