Myers v. First National Bank
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. Nathaniel J. Pillsbury, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scott
The law is well settled, that, where an extension of time is given a principal debtor for the payment of money, by a valid and binding agreement, without the assent of the sureties for its payment, they are thereby released. Danforth v. Semple, Sept. T. 1874. That principle is conclusive of the case at bar. Appellant was the security for the other makers of the note which is the basis of this action. An extension of time was given the principals to pay the indebtedness evidenced by the note, without the knowledge or consent of appellant. The consideration for the agreement was, that they…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Lemmon v. WhitmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- W. W. Kimball Co. v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Glenn v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Foster v. FurlongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Hamilton v. ProutyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.