Legal Opinion
Can Am Industries, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided March 26, 1986No. 85-3453PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ORDER
MILLS, District Judge:
Easement.
Injunction.
This case involves Can Am’s baseless refusal to allow Firestone to use an easement that ran across Can Am’s land.
Can Am acquired a state TRO, which we obviated by our own TRO and permanent injunction.
Can Am argued that they were afraid that Firestone would dig up, remove, and subsequently scatter hazardous waste, thus causing injury to Can Am when the waste was scattered around.
We found earlier that Can Am’s fears were absolutely without merit, as Firestone was refurbishing the site, not tearing it up, and that there was no merit to Can…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- George BADILLO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CENTRAL STEEL & WIRE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Edith R. Suslick, of the Estate of Alvin Suslick, Deceased v. Rothschild Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Coyne-Delany Co., Inc. v. Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Hanover Insurance Company, Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Grover v. Commonwealth Plaza Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago v. Terra Foundation for American ArtAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago v. Terra Foundation for American ArtAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Don Post Studios, Inc. v. Cinema Secrets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Dawson v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987