Legal Opinion
Rizzo v. Ammond
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 28, 1960No. Civ. A. 1030-59PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
This case is before me on defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 12, 28 U.S.C., more particularly, under subsection (b) of that Rule, for the following grounds: (1) lack of jurisdiction of the causes of action alleged; (2) lack of jurisdiction over the defendants; (8) non-joinder of indis-pensible parties; (4) lack of authority for plaintiffs' claimed representative status; and (5) “unclean hands” on the part of the plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs in this action, seven in number, are members, and two of them are officers, of Local No. 1262 (Local)…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America v. Malcolm BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Cleveland Orchestra Committee v. Cleveland Federation of Musicians, Local No. 4, American Federation of Musicians, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Vars v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & HelpersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
- Penuelas v. MorenoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.