Legal Opinion

Eisner v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 5, 1954No. 277-52PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff sues for just compensation for what she asserts to have been the taking of her property. The property in question was a deposit of 45,263.60 German Reichmarks which she had in a bank in Berlin. The alleged taking was the conversion, by an order of the American Military Commander in Berlin, of her claim against the bank, into 2,263.20 Deutsche Marks, a new type of currency. The plaintiff says that this conversion, at the rate of 1 for 20, confiscated 95 percent of her bank account.

Upon the unconditional surrender of Germany in 1945, each of the four Allied Powers…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dr. Curt Bamberger v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API