Legal Opinion

Daytona Development Corp. v. McFarland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 1984No. 83-1770PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs filed a legal malpractice suit against the defendants on February 22, 1978. The defendants raised as an affirmative defense that the action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1977). This section provides that a suit for legal malpractice shall be commenced within two years “from the time the cause of action is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” At the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ case at trial, the court granted the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict on the *762ground that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swagel v. GoldmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Smith v. HusseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hofer v. RossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API