Reich v. Collins
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
In a long line of cases, this Court has established that due process requires a “clear and certain” remedy for taxes collected in violation of federal law. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. O’Connor, 223 U. S. 280, 285 (1912) (Holmes, J.). A State has the flexibility to provide that remedy before the disputed taxes are paid (predeprivation), after they are paid (postdeprivation), or both. But what it may not do, and what Georgia did here, is hold out what plainly appears to be a “clear and certain” postdeprivation remedy and then declare, only after the disputed taxes have been paid, that no…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Reynoldsville Casket Co. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dallas County Community College District v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- S & M BRANDS, INC. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.