Legal Opinion

Skinner v. . Bland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to set aside a judgment, heard at Spring Term, 1882, of Pitt Superior Court, before Gilmer, J. This is another motion made in the cause of Sheppard v. Bland, the preceding case, and to which reference is made for the better understanding of the facts of this case.

Read the full summary

Motion to set aside a judgment, heard at Spring Term, 1882, of Pitt Superior Court, before Gilmer, J. This is another motion made in the cause of Sheppard v. Bland, the preceding case, and to which reference is made for the better understanding of the facts of this case. After the motion of the defendant, Bland, to set aside the execution, under which bis land had been sold and purchased by Skinner, had been heard at fall term, 1881, of the superior court of Pitt county, and refused by the court, and after the said Bland had taken an appeal and caused the same to be docketed in this court, he…

1Opinion of the CourtRuffin, J.

His Honor’s ruling is in itself manifestly correct, and is. fully, supported by the authority of Isler v. Brown, 69 N. C., 125, and for the very reasons assigned by him. There is no error.

No error. Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Isler v. . Brown .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cowan v. CurranIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Green v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Hannon v. Commissioners of HalifaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Mowry v. HarrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API