Legal Opinion

Guy v. Stemberg-Rainey Hardware Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 3, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.

This is a replevin suit to recover possession of one mule. The plaintiff in error, Elmer Guy, as a special deputy sheriff, levied upon the mule as the property of one Sam Bond. Whereupon the defendant in error, plaintiff below, claiming under a mortgage, instituted this suit before a Justice of the Peace.

In the circuit court the case was tried by the judge without a jury and' there was a judgment in favor of the plaintiff below, and the defendant below has appealed and assigned error. In this court the defendant in error moves the court to dismiss the appeal because the plaintiff in error…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bostick v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Seymour v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Weakley County Road Commissioners v. Illinois Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Barr v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayes Chunn v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  2. Hayes Chunn v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API