Legal Opinion

United States v. Austin

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided April 20, 2021No. 6:09-cv-03250Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 09-03250-CV-S-MDH ) JAMES AUSTIN, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s pro se Motion. (Doc. 82.) In his motion, Defendant states that “I Do Not Trust Doctor Rice” and asks this Court to “Have Doctor Rice To Take Me Off The Haldol (Medication).” Id. Here, Defendant has an attorney, making his requests improper, and the Court “is not required ‘to entertain pro se motions filed by a represented party.’” United States v. Tollefson,

853…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mustafa Abdullah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Bruce Charles TollefsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API