Legal Opinion

Edge v. Stuckey

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlosser, J.

The evidence discloses that Miss Stuckey had been since the bank’s organization a director, vice president and a valuable customer; that Miss Vera V. Veail, the cashier, as a matter of accommodation looked after some of the financial affairs of Miss Stuckey in connection with the bank, as she also did for some other of the bank’s patrons. After the failure of the bank Miss Veail, acting as the agent of the plaintiff, notified Mr. Edge that Miss Stuckey had owned his note since April, 1929. The defendant claims that this was the first notice he had that the bank was no longer the owner of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Howell Motor Car Co.Allen County Court of Common Pleas · 1934
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Howell Motor Co.Allen County Court of Common Pleas · 1933
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. Harrison, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API