State v. Medina
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Malone, C.J.:
Juan Medina appeals his sentence of lifetime postrelease supervision following his conviction of aggravated criminal sodomy committed when he was under the age of 18. Medina argues that the imposition of lifetime postrelease supervision for juveniles convicted of a sex offense is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 9 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights. Based on controlling Kansas Supreme Court precedent, we agree. Thus, we vacate the lifetime postrelease supervision portion of Medina’s sentence for aggravated criminal sodomy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- State v. HiltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020