Legal Opinion

Rogan v. Rungee

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 3, 2016No. AC37398PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

The plaintiff, Michael Rogan, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered, in part, in favor of the defendant, Sally Rungee, on her counterclaim for abuse of process, common-law vexatious litigation, and statutory vexatious litigation. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) awarded damages to the defendant for emotional distress for abuse of process, (2) awarded treble emotional distress damages, and (3) held that the plaintiff failed to prove his affirmative defense that he acted on the advice of legal counsel. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Buckman v. People Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Bhatia v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LM Ins. Corp. v. Connecticut Dismanteling, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Hamann v. CarlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  3. White v. FCW Law OfficesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  4. Speer v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  5. Speer v. SkaatsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API