Legal Opinion

In RE LaNASA

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 9, 2009No. 2008-B-2294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

998 So.2d 73 (2009)

In re David P. LaNASA.

No. 2008-B-2294.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 9, 2009.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") against respondent, David P. LaNasa, a suspended attorney.

UNDERLYING FACTS

In 1993, respondent was suspended from the practice of law for two years after he used client funds without authorization and made false statements on his application to the Mississippi Board of Bar Admissions. In re: LaNasa, 625 So.2d 1337 (La. 1993). He never applied for reinstatement…

Also in this document: Dissent · Johnson; Dissent · Weimer.

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. BoutallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. In re DonnanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re HawkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API