Legal Opinion

Care & Protection of Isabelle

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 28, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The mother of a child who is the subject of a care and protection proceeding in the Juvenile Court appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying her petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. She seeks relief from an order placing the child in the temporary custody of the Department of Children and Families (department), following a so-called seventy-two hour hearing. G. L. c. 119, § 24. We affirm the single justice’s judgment.

Relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, is extraordinary. “We exercise our general superintendence power under G. L. c. 211, § 3, in exceptional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Operation RescueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Dunbrack v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Care & Protection of ZitaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Care & Protection of SophieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baez v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024
  2. Care & Protection of DanielleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Pope v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API