Legal Opinion

Hill v. Borough of Belmar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 26, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee 'Cuktam.

The writ of certiorari brings before us for review an ordinance entitled, "An ordinance providing for the construction of .a swimming pool in the borough of Belmar, and appropriating the money necessary for the work.

Prosecutors have filed nine specific and one general reason why the ordinance should be set aside. These are argued under six points or grounds.

The first, second and fourth may be considered together. They are :

1. The borough of Belmar has no right to spend public moneys for improving property to which it has no title.

2. Such title as the borough of Belmar has to the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lander v. Village of South OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. McVean v. City of ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Miller v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Biglin v. Town of West OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  5. LeFevre v. Board of City CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API