Legal Opinion · Dissent

Royer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 28, 1924No. 34193Published

1DissentDowney, Judge

I shall not discuss the principle upon which I predicate my dissent from the conclusion of my associates at a length commensurate with its importance for, while I deem lengthy discussion unnecssary, the importance of the principle is hardly to be overstated. It is not limited to the result of this case, for it must control a class of cases, and, as it is sustained or otherwise is there preserved or destroyed an established, recognized, and necessary governmental system as old almost as the Government itself.

The plaintiff, it is rightly said, was not a major during the period from October 18,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Gratiot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  3. United States v. BurchardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. George Howes & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API