Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, we conclude that it was sufficient to provide a valid line of reasoning to sustain the jury’s verdict (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Further, there is ample evidence in the record corroborating the accomplice’s testimony by connecting defendant with the crimes charged, thus satisfying the requirement of CPL 60.22 (1) (see, People v Moses, 63 NY2d 299). We additionally agree with the suppression court that reasonable cause for the police to stop defendant’s vehicle and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. People v. PetraliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BauerWatertown City Court · 1994
  2. People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API