Legal Opinion

Fryar v. Forrest

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1941No. 11033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Iona Mary Fryar against John P. Forrest, seeking to recover damages resulting to her as a result of alleged fraud perpetrated upon her by Forrest in an exchange of real properties.

The trial began to a jury, but the jury was peremptorily instructed to return a verdict for the defendant. Judgment was rendered in keeping with this verdict, and Iona Mary Fryar has prosecuted this appeal from such judgment.

We are of the opinion that the trial court properly directed a verdict for the defendant below. The evidence shows that Mrs. Fryar exchanged a piece…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reed v. HesterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Sibley v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Braxton v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Rahl v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Santa Ana Citrus Groves, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. B & R DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Rawdon v. GarvieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. B & R DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API