Legal Opinion

In re Swift

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 31, 1902No. 2,745PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On review of decision of referee in marshaling-assets between partnership and individual creditors.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELE, District Judge.

The question in this case concerns-the marshaling of assets between joint and separate creditors. Certain seats in the Boston and New York Stock Exchanges and the-Chicago Board of Trade stood in the name of Hodges. Originally they belonged to him. Before 1899 Hodges had done business as Hodges & Co., one Dowry being a nominal or salaried partner. By the rules of the stock exchanges, the seats could not stand in the-name of the firm, and the fact that they stood throughout in the name of Hodges throws no light upon their real ownership. In-1899 Hodges entered into an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kidd v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. New York Commercial Co. v. FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. Rasmussen v. GreslyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  3. Epstein v. SteinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  5. Kowalsky v. American Employers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API