Bodden v. Texas Marine Underwriters Agency, Inc.

ORDER AND REASONS

MENTZ, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, et al, collectively referred to as “Excess Underwriters,” to reconsider the Court’s January 22, 1991 Minute Entry denying their motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ direct action claim against them. After reviewing the motion, memoranda of counsel, the record and the law, the Court grants the motion for the reasons set forth below.

In the January 22, 1991 Minute Entry, the Court addressed two grounds urged by Excess Underwriters for dismissal: (1) a protection and indemnity (“P & I”)…