Smith v. Fontana
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The complaint in this action sets forth two causes of action. It is urged by the plaintiff that the first cause of action is for damages caused by an alleged false arrest, and the second for damages arising out of malicious prosecution. In the effort to extend liberality in the interpretation pleadings, the trial proceeded on the premise that there were two causes of action involved, one for false imprisonment and one for malicious prosecution.
It is alleged in the first cause of action that the defendant, on December 6, 1940, maliciously and with intent to injure the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People v. ZambounisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Chaplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Chaplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.