Legal Opinion

Birkholz v. Wilgus

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

The plaintiffs -seek to remove to this court an action pending in the Nassau County District Court on the ground that the damages sustained are greater than originally *583alleged, and that the District Court is not empowered to award a judgment for such increased amount. The application is made more than three years after the cause of action arose. A supporting medical affidavit states that the applicant, Grace Birkholz, was operated on for advanced glaucoma of the left eye, which was traumatic in origin; and in the opinion of the physician, was the result of the automobile accident of April 9,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toolis v. NaotasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API