Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 23, 2019No. 2:12-cv-00472Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KATHRYN M. NELSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12-C-472 JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Kathryn M. Nelson filed this lawsuit alleging she was injured as a result of the implantation of a Prolift Total Pelvic Floor Repair System device manufactured and sold by Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc. On May 14, 2009, Plaintiff underwent a vaginal hysterectomy along with the implantation of the Prolift device for pelvic organ prolapse. After the surgery, Plaintiff experienced numerous complications…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Martin Ex Rel. Scoptur v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. Ronald KnipferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Ernest Gibson v. American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API