Palmer v. Spandenberg
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the County Court of Brown County. Tried below before Hon. A. M. Brumfield.
1Opinion of the Court
KEY, Associate Justice.
— The defendant in error has submitted a motion to dismiss the writ of error in this case. None of the reasons assigned for dismissal are well taken, and some of them are so obviously untenable as to render discussion unnecessary. Two points only will be noticed. The first is that the writ of error bond, while signed at its conclusion by the sureties, is not so signed by the plaintiff in error. Such signing was not necessary. (Shelton v. Wade, 4 Texas, 148; Lindsay v. Price, 33 Texas, 282; McKellar v. Peck, 39 Texas, 385; Bridges v. Cundiff, 45 Texas, 439; San Roman v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Randon v. BartonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
- Lindsay v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1870
- San Roman v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Bridges v. CundiffTexas Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Woolley v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Castleberry v. CastleberryTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Cross v. Hancock's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.