Watkins v. Hodges
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from Baltimore county court, Assumpsit by the, appellant agajnst the appellees. The declaration contain-?, ed four counts: The first for goods sold and delivered. The second on a quantum meruit for; goods sold and delivered. The thirfl on an insimut computassenti and the fourth qnff special" agreement.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Baltimore county court, Assumpsit by the, appellant agajnst the appellees. The declaration contain-?, ed four counts: The first for goods sold and delivered. The second on a quantum meruit for; goods sold and delivered. The thirfl on an insimut computassenti and the fourth qnff special" agreement. The last count is as follows, viz. ‘.‘.Arid' whereas' heretofore, to wit, on the 3d of' February 1813, the defendants bargained for and bought of the plaintiff, an,d foe plaintiff, at the special instance, and request of the defendants, foen and there sold to the defendants,, at foe…
1Opinion of the Court
*44The.opinion of the court was.delivered by.
Martin, J.
This is an action on the case, instituted by the plaintiff to recover the price or, value of twenty-one hogsheads of tobacco, fold and. delivered to. the defendants, The declaration contains.four counts. 1st, A general inde-_ hitatus assumpsit 2,d. A quantum. merúif. 3d. An insi~u mul computassent And 4th. On a special agreement. The. plaintiff offered evidence to prove the delivery of, twenty-one hogsheads of tobacco to the defendants, some time in. March 1813. The defendants.then read to the jury a special agreement, admitted, to be in…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Coates v. SangstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- American Towing & Lightering Co. v. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Hoke v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Hartlove v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898