Legal Opinion
ProMed Healthcare v. City of Kalamazoo
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 2002No. Docket 224440PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmolenski, J.
Petitioner ProMed Healthcare appeals as of right from the Tax Tribunal order denying its request for tax-exempt status concerning ad valorem taxation on its personal property by respondent city of Kalamazoo. ProMed claimed that it qualified for either the “public health exemption,” MCL 211.7r, or the “charitable purpose exemption,” MCL 211.7o. Petitioner and respondent presented the dispute to the Tax Tribunal pursuant to a lengthy stipulation of facts. The Tax Tribunal ruled that ProMed was not entitled to either of the claimed tax exemptions. ProMed appeals as of right. We affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ladies Literary Club v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Rose Hill Center, Inc v. Holly TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. Lansing TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Retirement Homes of the Detroit Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc v. Sylvan TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Moorland Township v. Ravenna Conservation Club, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wexford Medical Group v. City of CadillacMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Spranger v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Gardner v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Trinity Health-Warde Lab, LLC v. Pittsfield Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bodeco LLC v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.