Legal Opinion
Stokes v. Reeves
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 2007No. 07-708Published
1Opinion of the Court
BERTHA MAE STOKES
v.
ROSE CLARK REEVES, ET AL
No. 07-708.
Court of Appeals of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
October 31, 2007
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION.
CRAIG RAY HILL, Jones & Hill, Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellee, Rose Clark Reeves, et al.
KATHRYN FOWLER VAN HOOF, Van Hoof Law Firm, Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant, Bertha Mae Stokes.
Court composed of DECUIR, PICKETT, and PAINTER, Judges.
PICKETT, Judge.
The appellant, Bertha Mae Stokes, appeals the trial court's judgment finding that the defendants were owners of a tract of land by virtue of acquisitive prescription of thirty years.
STATEMENT OF THE…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phillips v. FisherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Humble v. DeweyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Suire v. PrimeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ryder v. BelgardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005