Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 23, 2003No. A02A1818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Enoch Hubbard, acting pro se, appeals his conviction for burglary. He enumerates several errors made by the trial court, contending that (1) the evidence was insufficient; (2) the court erred in denying his motion in limine regarding identification; (3) the State improperly vouched for its witness; (4) the court erred in denying his motion for mistrial after the State’s witness improperly placed his character into evidence; and (5) his trial counsel was ineffective. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. We view the evidence on appeal in the light most favorable to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Todd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westbrooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Mims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API