Legal Opinion
(PC) Taylor v. Arnold
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 19, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02014Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:17-cv-2014 KJM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 ERIC ARNOLD, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil 18 rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 1, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s amended 19 complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court found that 20 plaintiff may proceed on a claim arising under the Eighth Amendment for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arlyn W. Nordhorn v. Ladish Company, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation Armco, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.