Legal Opinion

Roche v. Cerrato

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJames J. Conroy, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment to adjudge that plaintiffs have a prescriptive easement over a cemented strip between their and the defendants’ respective dwellings. The plaintiffs’ claim is based on the premise that an easement exists for the use of such driveway because of an implied grant by a former owner and further on the ground of necessity.

Between the two properties is a driveway 7 feet 6% inches wide and running back from the front of the properties 78 feet to the rear. This driveway occupies 5 feet 4% inches of the defendants’ and 2 feet 2 inches of the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nicholls v. . WentworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. McMillan v. . CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. De Forrest v. BunnieNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. De Forrest v. BunnieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roche v. CerratoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API