McLaurine v. Knowles
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The question here in controversy is the true location of the dividing line between Sections 2 and 11, Township 13, Range 21 in Bullock County. Section 2 is immediately north of Section 11. That part of Section 2 in controversy is owned by appellee Knowles and that part of Section 11 in controversy is owned by appellant Mc-Laurine.
The problem is to find the line which was originally located by'the government surveyors. There is no question of adverse possession. It is woodland and the original monuments and markers have long since been obliterated. There were available two…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Edwards v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Dougherty v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Varner v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Sandlin v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.