De Forest, Armstrong & Co. v. Miller
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Marion. Tried below before the Hon. M. L. Crawford. This case was before the court ata former term, and the • appeal dismissed, being from an interlocutory judgment, (37 Tex., 389.) All the facts necessary to a proper under-. standing of the case will be found embodied in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Devine, Associate Justice.
The proceedings in this cause originated in a seizure under an execution on behalf of appellants of the goods of Hugo Fox, to satisfy a judgment against Fox and others. Appellee, Miller, made claim, verified by affidavit, to one-half the goods taken in execution, claiming to be a partner in the business, and the owner of one-half of the stock, gave the required bond, and received the goods from the sheriff. The claim of appellee being docketed, and an issue between the parties being made, by order of the presiding judge, and atrial was had, a verdict being found in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rogers v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Converse & Co. v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Warren v. Wallis, Landes & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MinterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Bradford v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Meyberg & Wangelin v. Steagall & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
- O'CONNOR v. GableCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Grant & Berry v. Williams & TolliverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1883