Legal Opinion

Flora v. Cline

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 8594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Morris, C.

The appellee sued the appellant for work and labor. The complaint contained three paragraphs. The first and third paragraphs are in the usual form for work and labor.

The second paragraph states that on the 8th day of March, 1878, the plaintiff made application to the board of commissioners of Carroll county, stating, among other things, that he was the owner of certain wet lands therein described, and was interested in the construction of a drain to reclaim said lands, and that such drain could not be completed without affecting the lands of other persons; that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hellenkamp v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Port v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Nevins & Otter Creek Township Draining Co. v. AlkireIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taber v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Montgomery v. WasemIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Peters v. GriffeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Davis v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Scudder v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API