Legal Opinion

Casteel v. Hockaday

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 1, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*836Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

The appellee H'ockaday and Holy brought this action against the appellant, alleging that they were the owners of a lot in the Mallory Springs property that the appellant Casteel was wrongfully withholding from them. They described the property as lot No. 6 on a plat made by Parrish. They further averred tlaat after their purchase of the lot, they erected on the same a dwelling house, which they occupied each year during the summer months, and that the appellant Casteel knew that they had erected a house on this lot and were claiming to be the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Town of Whitesburg v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API