Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Hoffman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 2, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trespass, guare clausum fregit. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1897. Reversed and remanded. Opinion- filed November 2, 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

This is an action of trespass quare clausum fregit brought by Hoffman, defendant in error, against Adams, Douglas and Marriott, plaintiffs in error.

The trial resulted in verdict and judgment against all the plaintiffs in error for the amount of $5,000.

It seems probable, if not certain, from the evidence, that the verdict was to a considerable extent for smart money.

The sixth instruction given for the' plaintiff in the trial court, informed the jury in effect that if they found the trespass to have-been committed under such circumstances as evinced a disposition on the part of defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grund v. Van VleckIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Pardridge v. BradyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881
  3. Leslie v. FischerIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mead v. PollockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Goldstein v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Murray v. WernerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API