Legal Opinion
Cates v. Darland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 24, 1975No. 46403PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice:
This action was commenced as a result of the sale of a certain 1967 Ford automobile by the Appellant, Darryl Cates, d/b/a National Motor Company [hereafter referred to as “Cates”], to the Appellee, Danny J. Darland [hereafter referred to as “Darland”]. Darland alleged that a fraud [odometer was turned back and salesman had represented reading as true mileage] was perpetrated upon him by Cates in the transaction and brought this action to recover actual and punitive damages.
The mileage shown at time of purchase was 34,676 miles. The previous owner testified that it had 74,624…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Jones v. West Side Buick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936
- United States v. Dorwin MarineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Mitchell v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Virginia M. Edgar v. Fred Jones Lincoln-Mercury of Oklahoma City, Inc. And Fred Jones, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Sarah M. Spaeth v. Union Oil Company of California, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.