Legal Opinion
Oxford v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 16, 1977No. 12580PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
Appellant, Harmon Robert Oxford, who was plaintiff below, brought this suit for declaratory judgment, praying for temporary restraining order “until this [trial] Court has time to try the case on the merits,” and seeking to establish invalidity of the Texas Child Care Licensing Act (Art. 695a-3, V.A.C.S.; Acts 1975, 64th Leg., p. 2240, ch. 708, eff. Jan. 1, 1976). Oxford named as defendants the Attorney General of Texas and the Commissioner of the Texas Department of Public Welfare.
The Attorney General, for his office and the Commissioner, answered by exception and general…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Cobb v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Director of the Department of Agriculture & Environment v. Printing Industries Ass'n of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Dillard v. Austin Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Central Power and Light Co. v. Sharp, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- State Ex Rel. Pringle v. Heritage Baptist Temple, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.