Cedeno v. Moran Hauling

¶ 29. I respectfully dissent. Cedeno argues that his imperfect command of the English language prevented him from properly reporting his injury despite his best efforts to do so. The majority finds that the administrative law judge and Full Commission adequately considered this obvious language barrier. After searching Mississippi case law, there are no precedents in this regard. Since this is a matter of first impression, the majority has correctly looked to similar cases from our sister states that are helpful in answering this question. Delta Pride Catfish, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co., et al.,…