Salvage v. Haydock
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
It appears that the defendant is now in possession of the premises, as this writ of entry is brought to oust him; but it does not appear from the case with certainty when he and those under whom he claims went into possession, but presumably it was at the date of the deed under the power of sale. If so, as the deed under which the plaintiff claims was executed and delivered after that date, the possession of the defendant and those under whom he claims would be constructive notice of the existence of their deed, and their title would be good against the plaintiff. Patten v. Moore,32 N.H. 382;…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burns v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Brown v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Montgomery v. DorionSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1833
- Green v. CurrierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
- Stantons v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. O'DellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Brynjolfson v. OsthusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- McCreary v. CoggeshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906