Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Mayor of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At chambers. Motion to vacate preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

This action is brought to obtain an injunction perpetually enjoining and restraining the defendants, the mayor, aldermen, and commonalty of the city of New York, the commissioner of public works, and the superintendent of incumbrances, from removing, tearing down, or in any manner whatever interfering with, the plaintiff’s awning, erected in front of his premises, Nos. 73 and 75 Bowery, in the city of New York. An injunction was obtained in the first instance, and a motion is now made to vacate the same. I have read the numerous affidavits on the part of the plaintiff, tending to show that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  4. Kellinger v. Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Ely v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Savage v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. World Realty Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Brinkman v. EislerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API