Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hunt v. Sherrill

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1943No. 35398Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion.

Smith, C. J.,

delivered a separately concurring opinion.

This is am action for deceit and the gist of such an action is damage, without which it will not lie. Hall v. Thompson, 1 Smedes & M. 443; Harris v. Ransom, 24 Miss. 504; Salter v. Aviation Salvage Co., 129 Miss. 217, 91 So. 340, 26 A. L. R. 987; Praetorians v. Thompson, 160 Miss. 85, 133 So. 228; 23 Am. Jur., Fraud & Deceit, Section 172; 37 C. J. S,, Fraud, Sec. 40.

The damage claimed in such an action in order to be recoverable must be such as the law permits in the class of transactions which include the transaction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tyson v. UtterbackMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Pass v. McRea, Coffman & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Laurel Auto Supply Co. v. SumrallMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Estell v. MyersMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Deshatreaux v. BatsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API