Legal Opinion

S. F. Hess & Co. v. Heegaard

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit and set-off. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

The appellant, a corporation, sued the appellee for goods sold and delivered, upon an account substantially undisputed. The defense was a set-off exceeding the demand sued upon.

For the purposes of this opinion it is assumed that J. E. Avery was the general western agent of the appellant, and resident of Chicago, where the appellee was in business.

Cigarettes were the goods principally dealt in between the parties.

The appellant was a manufacturer in Eochester, H. Y., and a fierce competition was raging between it and a monopoly named American Tobacco Company, for the trade of buyers.

The…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Braun v. S. F. Hess & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Halladay v. UnderwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Dobson v. MoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  4. Kinser v. Calumet Fire Clay Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Heegaard v. S. F. Hess & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API