Sanders v. Bartelt
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court, Spokane County.— Hon. William: E. Richardson, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, J.
This is an action to foreclose a lien for labor which the respondent claims to have performed on the property of the appellants. The only question arising is whether respondent was to receive $3 or $2.50 per day for his work. The time respondent worked was twenty-four days and six hours. Briefly stated, one Rube Reynolds, who was a foreman of Bartelt, one of the appellants here, by authority of Bartelt, employed the respondent to work on Bartelt’s building. He contracted with the respondent to pay him $3 per day, but the appellants claim that…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Rohlinger v. Coletta Land & Orchard Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958