Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Bartelt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1901No. 3686PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court, Spokane County.— Hon. William: E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an action to foreclose a lien for labor which the respondent claims to have performed on the property of the appellants. The only question arising is whether respondent was to receive $3 or $2.50 per day for his work. The time respondent worked was twenty-four days and six hours. Briefly stated, one Rube Reynolds, who was a foreman of Bartelt, one of the appellants here, by authority of Bartelt, employed the respondent to work on Bartelt’s building. He contracted with the respondent to pay him $3 per day, but the appellants claim that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rohlinger v. Coletta Land & Orchard Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API